Optimal Length of Random Wire Antenna
        
    
    J. C. Sprott
      
      Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin,
          Madison, WI 53706, USA 
      April 26, 2012 (revised May 24, 2022)
    
    Much has been written about the optimal length of a random wire
      antenna (sometimes called a long wire antenna), some of which is
      contradictory. An antenna that will tune to an acceptable SWR
      (without a balun with a large turns ratio as is common with EFHW
      antennas) using a common antenna tuner throughout the amateur
      radio bands of 1.8-2, 3.5-4, 7-7.3, 10.1-10.15, 14-14.350,
      18.068-18.168, 21-21.45, 24.89-24.99, and 28-29.7 MHz would at a
      minimum entail using a quarter wave resonance frequency lower than
      the lowest operating frequency and avoiding lengths that are
      multiples of a half wavelength on any of the higher frequencies
      where the impedance at the feed point would be unacceptably high.
      
    
    I wrote a program in PowerBASIC to calculate
      the gaps in the quarter-wavelength frequency spectrum over the
      range 0-30 MHz in 10 Hz steps where such resonances would be
      absent and the corresponding required electrical lengths of the
      antenna. Running the program produced
      the following output:
    
    Gap = 1 kHz at .874265 MHz (281 feet)
    Gap = 4 kHz at 1.07472 MHz (229 feet)
    Gap = 24 kHz at 1.15449 MHz (213 feet)
    Gap = 7 kHz at 1.241005 MHz (198 feet)
    Gap = 13 kHz at 1.256005 MHz (196 feet)
    Gap = 4 kHz at 1.27074 MHz (194 feet)
    Gap = 33 kHz at 1.366395 MHz (180 feet)
    Gap = 12 kHz at 1.39417 MHz (176 feet)
    Gap = 15 kHz at 1.492505 MHz (165 feet)
    Gap = 23 kHz at 1.543855 MHz (159 feet)
    Gap = 33 kHz at 1.666675 MHz (148 feet)
    Gap = 58 kHz at 1.720835 MHz (143 feet)
    Gap = 114 kHz at 2.20176 MHz (112 feet)
    Gap = 62 kHz at 2.30217 MHz (107 feet)
    Gap = 14 kHz at 2.482005 MHz (99 feet)
    Gap = 26 kHz at 2.512005 MHz (98 feet)
    Gap = 88 kHz at 2.58125 MHz (95 feet)
    Gap = 119 kHz at 2.74063 MHz (90 feet)
    Gap = 41 kHz at 2.990675 MHz (82 feet)
    Gap = 83 kHz at 3.069625 MHz (80 feet)
    Gap = 376 kHz at 3.311875 MHz (74 feet)
    Gap = 436 kHz at 3.930425 MHz (63 feet)
    Gap = 352 kHz at 4.341005 MHz (57 feet)
    Gap = 125 kHz at 4.604335 MHz (53 feet)
    Gap = 100 kHz at 5.00001 MHz (49 feet)
    Gap = 175 kHz at 5.1625 MHz (48 feet)
    Gap = 860 kHz at 5.792505 MHz (42 feet)
    Gap = 752 kHz at 6.62375 MHz (37 feet)
    Gap = 1609 kHz at 8.22951 MHz (30 feet)
    Gap = 1416 kHz at 9.792 MHz (25 feet)
    Gap = 1720 kHz at 11.585 MHz (21 feet)
    Gap = 1505 kHz at 13.2475 MHz (19 feet)
    
    In general, wider gaps are preferred. You can think of the gap as
    the accuracy to which the fundamental resonance frequency of the
    antenna must be adjusted to avoid high SWR at higher frequencies
    within the amateur bands. 
    
    The shortest antenna that has a chance of tuning all bands has an
    electrical length of 143 feet and should be trimmed to give a
    quarter wave resonance at 1.72 MHz. If one were to forgo 160 meter
    (1.8-2 MHz) operation, an antenna with an electrical length of 74
    feet should suffice and should be trimmed to give a quarter wave
    resonance at 3.31 MHz. These values assume that the antenna tuner is
    placed at the feed point of the antenna and that a suitable ground
    or counterpoise is provided.
    
    If there is a feedline between the antenna and the tuner, it is
    better to design the antenna to be resonant at the lowest desired
    frequency of operation, and then choose the feedline length between
    the antenna and the tuner to bring the total electrical length to
    one of the above values. Suppose, for example that one wants the
    antenna to operate at the center of the 80 meter band (3.75 MHz).
    Then the antenna must have an electrical length of 66 feet, and
    suitable feedlines would have electrical lengths of 8, 14, 16, 24,
    25, 41, 46, 77, ... feet. The required physical lengths are shorter
    as determined by the velocity factor of the feedline.
     
    
 
    Back to Sprott's Technical Notes